In brief: a figure that says more than the report
In the first 11 months of 2025, losses from economic crimes in Russia reached about $4 billion, reports the Foreign Intelligence Service of Ukraine (SZRU). For the reader this matters not as an abstract sum but as an indicator of deep managerial and corruption crises that have a direct connection to the regime’s military and economic resilience.
What the intelligence service calculated
Main directions of losses: fraud, embezzlement and misappropriation of assets, and illegal financial operations. The largest losses are linked to the theft of budget funds and abuses in large companies.
- About 70% of recorded crimes are classified as serious and especially serious.
- Crimes are concentrated around large financial flows controlled by the state or affiliated structures.
- Sectors with high corruption risk — construction, housing and communal services, and the military‑industrial complex.
"The growth of losses against a backdrop of a relatively stable number of cases points to structural problems in the Russian economy. The concentration of resources in the state and corporate sectors, weak control over their use, and high corruption risks reduce the country's investment attractiveness even for 'friendly' states and increase the economy's dependence on the administrative allocation of funds rather than market mechanisms."
— Foreign Intelligence Service of Ukraine (SZRU)
Why this matters for Ukraine
First, losses on this scale undermine Russia's ability to independently finance large projects and parts of military programs — especially if corrupt schemes disrupt logistical chains and supplies. Second, this is an argument for partners: corruption indicators make the Russian economy less attractive for investment and strengthen the case for targeted sanctions and anti‑corruption initiatives.
Analysts note that the concentration of resources in narrow circles only increases the regime's vulnerability: when major flows are controlled administratively, any internal chaos or external pressure more quickly leads to systemic failures.
Conclusion: what’s next?
These $4 billion are not just statistics but a signal. It confirms that corruption leakages weaken the aggressor’s economy and open opportunities for targeted political and sanctions measures. Now the ball is in the partners' court — declarations must be turned into concrete actions that minimize the regime’s ability to restore and consolidate these corrupt mechanisms.
Whether international institutions and Ukrainian partners will be able to use this evidence to increase pressure is one of the key questions for the coming months.