Quiet decisions weigh more than loud statements
Lithuanian Prime Minister Inga Ruginiene openly stated that Leonid Volkov's remarks about Ukrainian officials are unacceptable and that such a person should not remain in the country. The national broadcaster LRT quotes this position. The prime minister's words triggered an official procedure: the Department of State Security (BNS) is conducting an investigation, and the Migration Department is awaiting its conclusions before making a decision.
The prime minister's position
“In my personal opinion, such statements are unacceptable and such a person should not remain in Lithuania”
— Inga Ruginiene, Prime Minister of Lithuania
What was published
A recording (and a screenshot) appeared online in which, according to publications, Volkov allegedly rejoices at the possible killing of the commander of the Russian Volunteer Corps, Denis Kapustin, and criticizes Ukrainian officials, in particular the former chief of the Main Intelligence Directorate, Kyrylo Budanov. The very fact of publishing such material in a country that is a refuge for many political exiles has provoked public resonance and a reaction from authorities.
Legal context
Under Lithuanian law, a temporary residence permit can be annulled if an alien's stay poses a threat to national security, public order, or public health. On January 6, 2026, the Migration Department reported that it may consider revoking Volkov's residence permit — however the final decision will depend on the BNS's findings.
Why this matters for Ukraine
First, public calls or rejoicing over violent acts against figures associated with the war undermine the legitimacy of those opposing the regime in Russia and create information risks for Ukraine's partners. Second, when people in exile openly attack Ukrainian officials, it provides fodder for disinformation narratives and can complicate the coordination of international support.
International context and conclusion
The Lithuanian government's actions are an example of how allies respond not only to major geopolitical moves but also to the behavior of those within their jurisdiction. Analysts and diplomats note that such precedents set a standard: refuge is not automatic and comes with responsibility for public statements.
Now the ball is in the hands of Lithuania's security structures: will the BNS confirm a national security threat, and will the statements turn into formal restrictions. For Ukraine, it is important that partners maintain consistency between rhetoric and practice — since both security and reputational capital in international support depend on it.
