In brief
Ukraine attracted $52.4 billion of external financing in 2025 — roughly 25% more than in previous years, the Ministry of Finance reported. Since the start of the full-scale invasion, international partners have directed about $168 billion in budgetary support.
"Ukraine attracted $52.4 billion of external financing in 2025"
— Ministry of Finance of Ukraine
Who and how much
The main source in 2025 was the G7 mechanism using income from frozen Russian assets — $37.9 billion. The European Union sent $12.1 billion under the Ukraine Facility (of which $668 million were grants, the rest loans). International financial institutions provided: the IMF — $912 million after two reviews of the EFF program; the World Bank — $733 million for health, education and private sector support. Japan contributed $453 million through World Bank projects (DRIVE, SURGE, RISE), and the Council of Europe Development Bank — $232 million for payments to internally displaced persons.
"The IMF provided $912 million after successfully completing two reviews of the Extended Fund Facility program"
— IMF / Official data
Where the money went
International support fully covered social and humanitarian expenditures: pensions, salaries in education and health care, social protection and humanitarian programs. At the same time, all domestic financial resources were directed to the security and defense sector.
Why this happened and why it matters
The reasons are multi-layered: first, the G7 mechanism delivered large cash flows by using income from frozen Russian assets; second, partners’ political will to maintain stability in Ukraine as an important shield of European security. For citizens this means postponing harsh budgetary measures, preserving regular payments and stability of social services. For the war effort it means the ability to allocate domestic resources to defense without sharply increasing the fiscal burden.
Social and economic context
Experts note that the 2025 figures are not an end but a pause. There is a large EU commitment package — around €90 billion for 2026–2027 — but specific timing and payment schedules are important. A new IMF EFF program for 2026–2029 worth $8.1 billion has also been agreed at the expert level and will be submitted for approval by the Executive Board in 2026.
Risks and next steps
Main risks include delays in turning applications and political decisions into actual payments; the conditionality of some funding (loans vs grants) and dependence on reform dynamics for further IMF tranches. Next steps for Ukraine are to secure these flows with transparent allocation mechanisms, accelerate reforms that unlock access to long-term financing, and work with partners on payment schedules.
Conclusion
The 2025 figures offer cautious optimism: international financial support has eased immediate fiscal pressure and allowed focus on defense. But long-term stability will depend on how quickly partners’ pledges turn into regular payments and on the government implementing effective economic policy. The ball is now in the partners’ court and in the execution of reforms — what will determine the country’s financial resilience in the years ahead.
