CENTCOM Strikes Iran's Mine Laying Boats and Rocket Positions on Same Day Trump Spoke of "Nearly Signed" Deal

On May 25, American forces destroyed missile launch installations and Iranian boats attempting to lay mines — an hour before Trump's latest statements about negotiations. CENTCOM called this "deterrence during a ceasefire."

33
Share:
Дональд Трамп (Фото: AARON SCHWARTZ / EPA)

While negotiations in Oman were underway regarding a framework agreement between Washington and Tehran, CENTCOM conducted strikes on southern Iran on May 25. According to a statement by U.S. Central Command spokesman Captain Tim Hockins, the targets were missile launch systems and Iranian boats attempting to lay mines — presumably in the area near Bandar Abbas close to the Strait of Hormuz.

«American forces conducted strikes in self-defense in southern Iran to protect our forces from threats posed by Iranian forces. US Central Command continues to protect our forces while exercising restraint during the current ceasefire».

Captain Tim Hockins, CENTCOM spokesman, — Stars and Stripes

Strikes and negotiations — simultaneously

The paradox of the day: on that same May 25, Trump wrote on Truth Social that negotiations «are going very well,» but warned that if no deal is reached, military operations will resume. This dual rhetoric — «we are restrained» and «we are ready» — is a deliberate pressure tactic, not a contradiction.

According to Axios, citing an American official, the draft memorandum of understanding provides for a 60-day extension of the ceasefire, within which the Strait of Hormuz will resume operations, Iran will be able to freely sell oil, and negotiations on the nuclear program will continue on a separate track.

Uranium — the main sticking point

Washington's negotiating position on uranium remains unclear. Special Envoy Steve Witkov initially allowed for the preservation of enrichment, then rejected it. Trump publicly demands the «complete dismantling» of the nuclear program and the removal of all enriched uranium from Iranian territory — and refuses to sign a final agreement without these conditions. Secretary of State Rubio confirmed this position separately: «This issue will be resolved — one way or another».

According to CBS News sources, Iran has in principle agreed to the disposal of highly enriched uranium, but the details of the control mechanism remain open. According to the IAEA, as of December 2024, Iran has accumulated an unprecedented stockpile of highly enriched uranium without convincing civilian justification — enough for several bombs in a short timeframe.

What the strikes mean tactically

Mines in the Strait of Hormuz are not an abstract threat. Approximately 20% of global maritime oil transit passes through the strait. The American blockade has already halted over 100 commercial vessels. The strikes against boats attempting to lay mines fit into the logic of protecting this corridor — not as escalation, but as backing up the negotiating position with force.

CENTCOM provided no additional details regarding the scale of the strikes and casualties among Iranian forces. Tehran has not officially responded.

If the memorandum is signed without a verified mechanism for uranium removal — the agreement will have the same structural vulnerability as the 2015 JCPOA, which Trump previously exited precisely due to the lack of reliable verification.

World News

Business

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

11 hours ago