Brief
According to Reuters, the management of the German oil refinery Schwedt, owned by Russia's Rosneft, privately wrote to the German government with a warning: U.S. sanctions are harming the plant's operations and "putting at risk" fuel supplies to Berlin and the surrounding region. The letter cites risks for the airport, road traffic in the capital, supplies across the state of Brandenburg and key components for the chemical industry.
What was reported
Schwedt received a temporary exemption from U.S. sanctions imposed at the end of 2025 against Rosneft and Lukoil. That exemption expires on 29 April. Plant management points to dependence on long-term contracts, banking corridors for payments, insurance policies and suppliers (including from Kazakhstan) — and says that fears of possible sanctions are already restricting operational activity.
"We are already feeling... constraints in our operational activity"
— Schwedt management, letter (via Reuters)
Context: why this matters for Europe
Germany's Rosneft subsidiary and related assets accounted for roughly one third of the country's oil refining. After Russia's full-scale invasion in 2022, Berlin placed these assets under temporary trust management but refrained from nationalization — partly due to the risk of reciprocal steps by the Kremlin against German businesses in Russia (Bloomberg reported). Reuters and sources familiar with the letter also report the possibility of a sale of Schwedt: one oil group and a major investor had already considered a purchase.
What partners are saying
Germany's energy ministry said it is negotiating an extension of the U.S. license and plans to support the refinery. In Washington, U.S. officials advised American companies to consider buying Rosneft's German business, but an anonymous U.S. official told Reuters that interest in investing in Europe in recent months has been limited.
Why Ukraine should monitor this
Sanctions on the energy sector are an important tool of pressure on the Russian economy. On the other hand, there is a risk that efforts to avoid supply disruptions could be used as a pretext to ease that pressure. For Ukraine it is critical that European partners maintain sanctions pressure on Russia while avoiding real energy disruptions that the Kremlin could exploit for geopolitical purposes. Reputable media (Reuters, Bloomberg) and sources familiar with the process emphasize this very dilemma.
Possible scenarios
In the coming weeks Berlin has several options: extend the exemption in coordination with the U.S.; facilitate the sale of the plant to a private investor; or consider a state takeover. Each option carries its own risks and political consequences: from weakening the sanctions' effect to potential economic pressure from the Kremlin in response.
Conclusion
This story is an example of how sanctions policy intersects with real energy security questions in Europe. Reuters and Bloomberg provide the factual basis; now the ball is in Berlin's court and that of its partners: can they combine maintaining sanctions pressure on the Kremlin with ensuring stable fuel supplies for millions of Europeans?
