What happened
In the night of January 10 the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine confirmed strikes on the oil depot "Zhutovska" in Oktyabrsky District of Volgograd Oblast and on a number of facilities in the temporarily occupied territories of Donetsk and Zaporizhzhia. The command's statement says the hits were delivered by strike UAVs; the extent of the damage is being clarified.
Purpose of the strikes: logistics matter more than show
According to the General Staff, the oil depot was struck as part of measures to reduce the offensive capabilities of Russian units — this facility is involved in supplying fuel to the occupying army. The distance from the depot to the front line is over 400 km in a straight line, which underscores operations targeting the depth of the enemy's logistics.
"In all cases, hits by strike UAVs on targets were recorded. Enemy losses are being clarified"
— General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine
What else was hit
In addition to the oil depot, the General Staff reported strikes on several operational targets in the occupied territories:
→ in Zaporizhzhia Oblast — a UAV depot of a unit of the 19th Motor Rifle Division;
→ in the Pokrovsk area (Donetsk Oblast) — a command/control point for Russian drones;
→ in Donetsk Oblast — a concentration of personnel of the 76th Air Assault Division (Kurakhivka), a command-and-observation post of a tank battalion, and a command post of a unit of the 41st Army (the town of Hirnyk).
Context: systemic pressure on supply lines
This operation is not isolated. On the night of January 7 defenders struck the oil depot "Oskolneftesnab" in Belgorod Oblast and other facilities. The sequence of strikes on support facilities points to a pragmatic strategy — to break the supply chains that allow the enemy to build up offensive potential.
Consequences and risks
In the short term — complications in fuel deliveries and logistical support for Russian units on certain axes. The medium- and long-term effect will depend on how quickly the adversary can restore logistics or reroute supply lines.
What this means for us
The focus on logistics facilities demonstrates a pragmatic approach: not just pinpoint strikes for publicity, but systematic work that affects the enemy's ability to conduct operations. For citizens, this means that defense continues to operate not only at the front line but also where decisions about supplies are made and where those supply capabilities can be undermined.
Conclusion
The strike on "Zhutovska" is part of a broader strategy: to operate in depth and weaken the enemy's supply chains. It is now important to observe whether these tactical successes will turn into a lasting strategic advantage — and how the opponent will respond in terms of logistics and reserve supply systems.
